The full background is here, but basically is a case of using a mix of Opta's big chance metric to get beyond just using location data, combined with location and shot type (e.g., was the attempt a header). It's not as good as having the full video of every shot but is an improvement on just knowing shot volume.
|These categories aren't set in stone but are a decent first pass at grouping shot types|
None of the above is perfect, some of the splits are arbitrary and there will be some chances that are on the boundary of two groups where a slight change in location could change it from being a 'Good' to an 'OK' chance. The aim for now though is to get a rough feel of the type of chances teams are creating. With a bit more data (and a bit more time), I'd expect what goes in to these groupings to change a bit.
Splitting this out by team gives the following for Goals scored:
Obviously that's a pretty busy table and I'll probably look at individual teams in more detail when they are due to play Swansea, but the key things from it for me are:
- Liverpool scoring 10 penalties (of 12 attempts) , on the latest Game podcast Rory Smith makes the point of how often Suarez had the knack of playing the ball on to an opponents hand, they'll still have plenty of pace in the team but may find it hard to get that number of penalties again although I'm sure Liverpool fans could reel off plenty of times they didn't get one
- Norwich (& Swansea) scoring only 1 goal from a 'Great Chance' all season. Different teams have different styles and some may lack the close in shots that are the 'Great Chances' but neither created too many of these chances ether (5 and 4 respectively).
- West Ham with only 3 goals from 'Hit and Hope', their lower conversion is partly due to them having the highest number of shots from headers
Looking at actual shot location adds a bit more context, below is Norwich's shot map:
|Norwich had below average conversion in each of the groups apart from 'Hit + Hope', there's a lot of chances within the 6 yard box (but few classed as 'Great Chances' you'd need video to get further into whether it was bad chances or bad finishing|
|Chelsea with a high proportion of goals coming from on or just outside the edge of the box (which highlights the issue of having a inside/outside box split) as well as close in within the central part of the 6 yard box|
|Arsenal's goals coming more from the central area of the penalty box and fewer from outside the box|
There's always the risk by cutting data too many times you're left with something which just exists by chance, but given Howard's performance v Belgium in the World Cup, it's possible he is above average at stopping these kinds of chances (he saved 12 of the 16 on target - 75% compared to a division average of 43%).
Fulham's goals conceded map makes uncomfortable viewing, a ton of goals from close in and plenty from range too:
Having this kind of data opens up all sorts of possibilities, the free kick chart below throws up some questions:
Goal Location for Top 4 - Man City prevalent on edge of 6 yard box and Liverpool with a number of goals from narrow angles
Twitter: @we_r_pl http://www.twitter.com/we_r_pl