Pages

Monday, 20 October 2014

Stoke 2 - Swans 1 Video Analysis

Other posts: Corner Analysis

Following on from the match stats I've had a look at some of the issues from the game.  I've recently started doing some video analysis for my local non-league team which is a bit of an eye opener after being used to having detailed Opta stats on a plate.

With the Stoke game being in full on Sky, this gave me the chance to use Longomatch to try and look at a couple of areas in particular, some of the bad passing from defence as well as looking at the hold up play of Bony (and to a smaller extent Gomis).  Footage quality isn't the best but hopefully gives a rough idea.

Any compilation needs to be taken into context and just having the bad moments can seem overly critical, for the passing it was mainly wayward passes towards Bony.  Two of these were indirectly responsible for Stoke's goals: Fernandez lofting in a free kick after seemingly being unsure what to do with it led eventually to Stoke's pen (pass 009 on the video, they're labelled as bad long passes but the definition of long/bad is a loose one).
video

The second goal came as a result of a pass from Rangel being intercepted (last example in the video above) which in turn results in defenders being out of position, as much as Taylor shouldn't have let Walters across him, he does have two players at the back post.


Looking at the passes to Bony/Gomis, the next video is a selection of where the ball is played up to them with their back to goal, when it sticks it's great (number 007 is particularly nice) but other times the ball goes all over the place.
video
Watching the game back, the second half wasn't as bad as I first thought but to get nothing after scoring the first goal is a big disappointment.  Obviously the Stoke penalty decision overshadow's most other things but a persecution complex won't do us any favours.

Other than the West Brom game, it's been fine margins that have decided the result one way or another (even though Chelsea in the end beat us comfortably the turning point was conceding so close to half time) and even though the fixture schedule looks daunting in coming weeks with Everton/Arsenal/Man City to come in the league I expect us to be in contention for points in every game.

Stoke 2 - Swans 1 Match Stats and Analysis

To get the obvious main talking point out of the way first, yes it was a dive by Moses and a cheap penalty but that can't hide the fact that it was a disappointing second half for the Swans.

After a fantastic first 10-15 minutes especially where a series of great passing moves with Bony as the fulcrum cut through Stoke a number of times the momentum was more with Stoke from Swansea's goal onwards.
Other than a late flurry of long range shots after Emnes' introduction late on, Stoke dominated in terms of  efforts on goal after Swansea took the lead
I think at some point having both Bony and Gomis on at the same time could cause real havoc, but was surprised it was a combination used in this game given Bony's international travels.  You could argue it was a positive move to try and win the game but it felt like it didn't work in this instance.
Pass volumes (per 5 minutes) by Team - Swansea with majority of the ball early on and in the lead up to the penalty.  Post double substitution (64 min) Swansea with another peak but then going more direct from about the 70th minute onwards
As much as Taylor gets the blame for Stoke's second, it stems from a misplaced pass out of defence from Rangel, one of the things that seemed noticeable in the game was the number of misplaced passes from defence into midfield/attack.

There was a lot of focus in the ball played into Bony's feet with his back to goal, a lot of the time it worked well and there was some great hold up play by him at times.  When it didn't work however, either through a bad pas or bad control Stoke often had the opportunity to then break on Swansea's defence.

In a follow up blog I'll be trying to put some video's together looking at this in more detail.

Twitter: @we_r_pl http://www.twitter.com/we_r_pl
Match Stats: Created using Statszone , Whoscored  and Squawka

Monday, 13 October 2014

The Value of Corners - 94 clubs and 25,000 corners analysed

I was planning on looking at effectiveness from corners anyway but Swansea's stats in this regard make it even more pertinent.

From the 7 Premier League games so far this season, Swansea have had 12 corners with the next lowest team being Burnley with 25 (West ham are highest with 53). Why Swansea have had so few is for another blog but this one is concerned with the question of do corners count and who does them well.

Ben Mayhew from the Press Association tweeted me this image looking at Average Number of Corners per game and final position:
As with any stat there will be exceptions but averaging over 6 corners generally comes from a team in the top 8 not one fighting relegation.  Swansea's average so far of 1.7 per game is off the scale (but not in a good way) 
There appears to be some link between corners and final position although I'd expect it to be more 'Good teams win lots of corners' rather than 'Winning lots of corners makes a team good'.

There's a good piece by James Horncastle from a couple of years ago looking at a guy in Italy called Gianni Vio who is considered a set-piece guru.  He's recently joined AC Milan so is still making a career out of being a set-piece specialist.

There have been a number of studies looking at the value of a corner such as by Anderson/Sally in 'The Numbers Game' and on Statsbomb among many others.  One of the issues is how to credit a goal to a corner? It's easy enough if the goal comes straight from a corner crossed in, but what about the secondary phase after a corner is cleared or if the corner is initially played short?

Most previous analysis credits a goal to a corner if it is scored within 3 touches, what I've tried to look at is to use the match reports on the BBC that are generated using Opta data to try and analyse activity in the period after a corner is awarded. The data isn't perfect as the timestamp relates to when it was logged that a corner was awarded and not when taken, but is good enough for some rough calculations.

From this data I've gathered information on over 25,000 corners that have been taken in games involving clubs from the English leagues (includes League, Domestic and European cups to try and get as much data as possible even if it risks adding unfair comparisons).  These games took place between 1st Oct 2013 and mid-Sep 2014.

The first thing I looked at was corners that produce other corners, the aim of this was to remove double counting so at a later stage you could say 'If I get a corner, I'd expect this phase of play to finish in a goal x% of the time'.

Overall, from the 25,892 corners analysed 3,079 (12%) are awarded within 60 seconds of the previous corner being awarded so could crudely be classed as part of the same phase of play.  The linked corners could either be as the result of a shot or due to a defensive clearance (it's there in the data but that's for another day).

No Surprises - Time to next corner is most likely to be shortly after you've been awarded a corner.  There will be a variable time between the awarding and actual taking of a corner but things level out around the 60 second mark
As you'd expect, the 12% isn't a uniform figure and there are some major differences by team, ranging from 18% down to 7.5%:
10 Highest and 10 lowest clubs in terms of % of corners that are awarded within 60 seconds of previous corner. Everton's and Arsenal's corners per game figures are much closer when factoring out linked phases with multiple corners (I'm guessing Everton favour in-swinging corners towards near post more than Arsenal)
When charting average number of corners per game by % of corners that are awarded within 60 sec of a previous corner a few teams stand out:
In terms of raw average Corners per game Burnley and Scunthorpe are pretty similar but Scunthorpe have far more 'Linked' corners. Overall Chesterfield have the highest number of 'Corner Phases' per match with Man City in second with Leeds the bottom of the 94 teams analysed (the 92 from 2013/14 along with Luton and Cambridge)
Corners are all well and good, but ultimately it's goals that count, you know you're clutching at straws if you say '..but we won 8-2 on corners'.

If we look at the last corner in a sequence (where no corner awarded in previous 60 seconds), we are left with 22,813 corners from which to analyse the subsequent goal return.
The presence of 3 goals occurring the same time the corner is awarded shows the data isn't perfect but similarly to corners, goal response tends to tail off just after the minute mark.
Again as with subsequent corner activity, there's huge variation in number of corner phases that lead to a goal:
Top/Bottom 10 clubs by % of their corner phases that end with a goal within 70 seconds
When plotting Number of Corner Phases by Conversion rates you get some major differences:
Performance ranges from Man City who were had the 2nd highest number of Corner phases and 5th best conversion to Dagenham & Redbridge who had 3rd lowest number of corner phases and lowest conversion
All of the above looks at the attacking impact of a team but this can be reversed to see how well each team fares when facing corners:
These figures just look at Goals Scored/Conceded per match without taking into account volume of corners.  Reading show the ideal combination of High scoring and Low conceding from corners while Dagenham & Redbridge are the worst of 94 clubs in both aspects.  Those below the blue line are 'Corner Positive' in that they score more than they concede from Corners
One of the main questions from anything like this is 'Is this repeatable?' are clubs that were performing particularly well/badly in this analysis doing the same previously (and more importantly are they likely to do so in the future)?  I only have approx 1 season's worth of data in this format but it's interesting to see that the Stasbomb piece that is from Aug 2013 also mentions Newcastle at being bad from corners over a totally separate time period.

In an ideal world if you had the Prozone data for example, you could code up all corner scenarios where at least 1 centre back enters the opposition penalty area and link all activity as part of the same phase until that player has returned to his own half.

Also, all the timings of events relate to when events entered in to the system and the 60/70 second cut-offs are arbitrary as is the decision to include all games and not just league but the analysis shows the kind of things you could look out for when creating your own bespoke metrics at a club.  There's also the risk of conceding on the counter-attack from your own corner that needs to be factored in, Stoke's winner and Chelsea's goal v Man City at the Etihad this season were both breakaway's from Man City Corners.

The next stage will be to try and look at what teams that have a higher scoring % do.  If the answer to the question 'How do I score as many goals from corner situations as Man City' is 'Buy Silva, Aguero and Dzeko' then that's no use to anybody.

Similarly if Reading's strength in scoring from and not conceding from corners is due to having centre backs who are terrible at everything else that's not much use either, but given there are plenty of less glamorous clubs with high returns from these situations suggests that it could also be process and not just personnel that matters.

Corners alone won't win you a title or get you relegated but in a game of fine margins, if everything else remains unchanged, well executed corners (and set pieces in general) can make a difference.

Other Posts: Premier league Shot LocationWorld Cup Shot Location World Cup Distance + Sprint Stats
Twitter: @we_r_pl http://www.twitter.com/we_r_pl
Stats: Created using BBC Sport

Monday, 6 October 2014

Swans 2 - Newcastle 2 Match Stats

I think you'd be taking positive thinking too far not to be disappointed with just a point after taking the lead twice against a team with a recent record like Newcastle's.  Shot wise this was the first league game this season where we'd had more than the opposition:
For a match with 4 goals, only 20 shots is a pretty low number but least Swansea got slightly higher than the 9 efforts per game they're averaging in the league
Positives from this game will be Bony's first of the season and another 2 Gylfi assists taking his league total to 6 (only Fabregas on 7 has higher, with a number of players next closest with 3).

Random stat of the season of the season so far is that every other Premier League team has at least twice as many corners as Swansea.  Swansea have 12 from 7 games (av. 1.7 per game) with the next lowest being Burnley with 25.  Top of the pile is West Ham with 53 (7.6 per game).

Off the top of my head 5 of Gylfi's 6 assists have been through balls to create 1v1s against the keeper, as was Jonjo's goal v Chelsea (via a Bony Assist).  The John Terry own goal has been the only 'scrappy' goal scored so far this season in the league.

Although 1v1 are great opportunities to score is the lack of corners the result of not mixing up play enough, a result of sitting back in some games (either protecting a lead or having 10 men) or just a bit of a freak number?

Twitter: @we_r_pl http://www.twitter.com/we_r_pl
Match Stats: Created using Statszone , Whoscored  and Squawka

Monday, 29 September 2014

Sunderland 0 - Swans 0 Stats and Chalkboards

I think Ki's description of  the game as 'a bit boring' hits the nail on the head, some matches you just take the point and move on to the next week, especially after having to play from the 80th minute with 10 men.

Even without the sending off, this, like the other 5 league games so far this season was another game where the opposition had more shots.  Shot volumes aren't everything but Swansea's success so far in the league has been due to taking the odd very good chance that's come along rather than creating a multitude of average chances.
Sunderland with 15 shots overall, but almost half of those coming from a couple of short spells of pressure (around 35 min and 88 min)
Pass wise it can be seen how post the sending off Swansea retreat into a shell:
Passes per minute (by 5 min period), Sunderland with very little of the ball in the first 25 minutes, Swansea with little of it post 60 minute mark
When looking at the cumulative figures, Swansea had double the passing volume of Sunderland in the first half but Swansea's control goes long before Rangel's dismissal:
The change in passing volumes ties in with Jordi Gomez's introduction. Gomez made 27 passes after coming on in the 58th minute with Cattermole being their highest passed with 42 passes over the 90
Despite only playing a third of the match, Gomez also made more final third passes than anyone else, although this will have been helped by the sending off as the pass figures from the 85th minute onwards show a total (and understandable) defensive mindset from Sunderland.

Pass Volumes from 85th minute to end of the match, Sunderland working mainly down Swansea's right
Getting to double figures after just 6 games is a great achievement (this took 8 games in both seasons under Laudrup and 10 games in 11/12 under Rodgers) and all is pretty rosy at the moment although a few more shots per game wouldn't hurt,

Twitter: @we_r_pl http://www.twitter.com/we_r_pl
Match Stats: Created using Statszone , Whoscored  and Squawka

Wednesday, 24 September 2014

Swans 3 - Everton 0 Match Stats

After two defeats in a row, this win both gives confidence in the short term before the match against Sunderland on Saturday but also longer term shows that the likes of Everton on not out of reach (admittedly Everton have had to play Thu-Sun-Tue and it wasn't a fully first choice XI but it's still a great result).

Shot wise Everton had the better of the first half but only 2 efforts in the second half and only managed 2 shots on target all game.
Swansea again getting outshot but arguably having the better quality opportunities
No Statszone/Squawka data available for Capital One cup games but there were plenty of positive performances again highlighting the depth of the squad.

Monday, 22 September 2014

Swans 0 - Southampton 1 Match Stats and Chalkboards

This game obviously hinged on the Bony sending off and as such makes it hard to read too much into it other than Swansea looked the better team at 11v11 so there's not too much to be downbeat about with the added bonus that Bony's suspension will be for a game he would have been on the bench for anyway (it'll be interesting to see if Modou Barrow gets any game time v Everton where Everton's fixture schedule of Thu-Sun-Tue give us a great chance to get one over on one of our bogey teams of recent years).

Shot wise, all of Swansea's 5 shots we with Bony on the pitch and all bar 1 of Southampton's efforts were after he was sent off:
Southampton with relatively consistent shot volumes over the course of the 2nd half, although 10 in a 45 minute period isn't a huge number
Pass wise the figures are equally bleak in the 2nd half for Swansea:
There's a major change in the gradient of the two lines in the second half (especially the last half hour where Swansea passing volumes almost flatline)
This can be seen in even more detail when looking at individual 5 minute periods:
There's a large period of the 2nd half (around 55-85 min) where Swansea are averaging less than a couple of passes a minute as Southampton have near total control
The next two league games are against Sunderland and Newcastle both of whom have form that you could consider to be erratic at best, although points wise things are still looking good, with another international break looming after those two games, a couple of points at least would help to keep the focus up rather than down the table.

Twitter: @we_r_pl http://www.twitter.com/we_r_pl
Match Stats: Created using Statszone , Whoscored  and Squawka